{"@context":{"dc":"http:\/\/purl.org\/dc\/elements\/1.1\/","skos":"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2004\/02\/skos\/core#","skos:broader":{"@type":"@id"},"skos:inScheme":{"@type":"@id"},"skos:related":{"@type":"@id"},"skos:narrower":{"@type":"@id"},"skos:hasTopConcept":{"@type":"@id"},"skos:topConceptOf":{"@type":"@id"}},"@id":"https:\/\/terminologias.filo.uba.ar\/apps\/sociables\/skos\/6149","@type":"skos:Concept","skos:prefLabel":{"@language":"es","@value=":"ARGUMENTACION"},"skos:inScheme":"https:\/\/terminologias.filo.uba.ar\/apps\/sociables\/","dct:created":"2014-07-25 14:47:09","skos:scopeNote":[{"@lang":"es","@value":"Discurso persuasivo "}],"skos:note":[{"@lang":"es","@value":"Eemeren, F. H. van, & Grootendorst, R. (2011). Una teor\u00eda sistem\u00e1tica de la argumentaci\u00f3n: la perspectiva pragmadial\u00e9ctica. Buenos Aires: Biblos.\n\nP\u00e9rez de Medina, E., Balmayor, E., & Marafioti, R. (1997). Recorridos semiol\u00f3gicos: signos, enunciaci\u00f3n y argumentaci\u00f3n. Buenos Aires: Universidad de Buenos Aires: Eudeba.\n\nPlantin, C., Marafioti, R., & Mu\u00f1oz, N. I. (2012). La argumentaci\u00f3n: historia, teor\u00edas, perspectivas. Buenos Aires: Biblios. "}],"skos:broader":["https:\/\/terminologias.filo.uba.ar\/apps\/sociables\/skos\/1843","https:\/\/terminologias.filo.uba.ar\/apps\/sociables\/skos\/1633"],"skos:related":["https:\/\/terminologias.filo.uba.ar\/apps\/sociables\/skos\/6019","https:\/\/terminologias.filo.uba.ar\/apps\/sociables\/skos\/6151","https:\/\/terminologias.filo.uba.ar\/apps\/sociables\/skos\/1622","https:\/\/terminologias.filo.uba.ar\/apps\/sociables\/skos\/1846"]}